February 2007 Edition
MEDICAL MANUFACURING
A San Diego Medical Firm Prototypes With a ‘Personal’ CNC Machine
Just as the PC brought affordable computing to the individual level, a medical development company takes advantage of the “small” CNC machine on the market
Technological factors often converge that make advances
inevitable. In the 1930s, six teams – each operating without
the knowledge of the others – were developing concepts of the
gas turbine engine: three in Germany, two in England and one
in Hungary. Frank Whittle in England and Hans Von Ohain
in Germany both brought aviation into the jet age. Technology
followers often call it “railroad time.” When the time and
technologies are right, advances like railroading will result
whether George Stephenson is around to invent it or not.
In the same vein, the technological
advances in small computers
and software have had an
effect on machine tools used for
prototyping.
“We’re really talking about
two different developments
which have combined to bring
useful 3D machining within
reach of the average Joe,” Mike Ko, senior product development
engineer, KFx Medical Corp.,
said.
“Both the hardware and the
software have been dropping in
price and rising in capability,
ease-of-use, and quality. On the
hardware side, development of
the Tormach PCNC machine is
one of the fi rst small capable and
affordable CNC machines.”
Frayed Cuffs
Ko knows do-it-yourself production from recent experience.
The San Diego-based KFx Medical is a venture-capital startup
founded in 2003 to develop clinically relevant solutions
to rotator cuff disease with a new approach for rotator cuff
orthopedic surgery.
Torn rotator cuffs alone account for more than 500,000
surgeries a year and have traditionally required many weeks
of rehabilitation.
Minimally-invasive surgical repair techniques provide
patients with less pain and reduce time until range of motion is restored, but require surgeons to have advanced videoscopic
skills.
KFx Medical is researching alternatives that provide less
invasive systems for the surgeon, while at the same time provide
a more anatomical-like repair for the patient that provide
clinical outcomes. More than four million people seek medical
advice each year due to shoulder pain. KFx Medical is a
privately held company.
The company’s new surgical technique, SutureCross
Knotless Anatomic Fixation,
involves less complex and
stronger tissue fasteners and
does not require suture knots.
To realize the fixtures and
application instruments from
the virtual realm of CAD to
real testable prototypes, Ko and
the KFx development team,
themselves, did the precision
cutting. The company invested
in a Tormach PCNC 1100, a
lightweight mill simple enough
to be operated by non-machinists
for short runs.
In-house Prototyping
By keeping multiple iterations
of the prototype designs
in-house, KFx Medical
avoided the costs and delays
of outsourcing parts for CNC
machining.
Ko said KFx Medical would have to spend at least three
times as much money to get the quality and capability the firm
got from creating prototypes in-house.
With the CNC machine tool from Tormach, Waunakee,
WI, at its disposal, KFx Medical cuts its own prototype and
preproduction components out of plastic, aluminum, and
stainless steel. Even 420 stainless steel injection mold cavities
were cut in-house in a matter of days rather than the weeks
typically quoted by an outside vendor, without the need to hire
an experienced CNC programmer or machinist.
“We were even able to use the 4thaxis
rotary capability of the machine to
fabricate prototype 316SS bone screws
with a variety of tapering spiral thread
designs,” Ko said.
In recent years, the price of CAD and
3D modeling software has brought the
technology within reach of individual
designers, entrepreneurs, and hobbyists.
Last decade’s rapid prototyping and 3D
printers permitted plastic replica fabricating
in the design studio – rather than
the shop floor – for testing the fit of parts
and assemblies before actual prototypes
begin. But, the final step of moving from
idea to product – creating a physical
prototype from actual materials – still
belonged in the industrial realm.
CNC machining not only involved
expensive equipment, it required expertise,
including the knowledge of G-code
and M-code, user-unfriendly machine
languages. As the development of the
“Personal CNC” follows the development
history of the personal computer,
the trend continues. What was once
industrial now becomes individual.
All in the Code
“The software and hardware have
become so capable, that a person can
learn machine tool programming and
then afford the tools necessary to go
from the initial concept, to the virtual
model, to the fabricated physical part,” Ko said, “without the need for a skilled
CNC programmer or a skilled CNC
operator.”
The term “Personal CNC” – coined
by Tormach CEO Greg Jackson
– describes the new Tormach mill
used by KFx Medical. The term
correlates to the first
personal computers
that shrunk in size and
price to become practical
tools for individuals.
Jackson and
the Tormach development
team spent three
years working with
high-quality machine
tool manufacturers
to reach their goal.
They created a small
precision CNC
machine that
meets the needs
of short-run production
at the lowest possible cost.
“Like a personal computer, the first
rule is that it must be affordable,” Jackson
said.
The Tormach PCNC 1100 retails
around $6,800, and comes with a
standard 34"×9.5" table and 17" vertical
clearance. It cuts iron, steel, titanium,
and chromium alloys, such as 300 or 400
series stainless.
To make the Tormach affordable,
the design concedes spindle power and
speed. It takes a few minutes longer to
cut a precise part on the Tormach machine
than larger industrial machines.
But, it also makes the machines suitable
for short production runs, research
and development prototyping, business
start-ups, machining instruction, and
hobby applications, rather than high volume
manufacturing.
Large Volume Ludicrousness
“A 1.5 hp CNC mill with 65 ipm
rapids is ludicrous in a large volume
production environment where minutes
per piece are crucial,” Jackson said.
“However, in a prototype environment,
where run time is a tiny fraction of
setup time, those extra minutes per part
aren’t relevant. What is relevant is the
cost savings.”
The design leverages the mass of
the machine against the surface cutting
speed, creating a careful trade-off
between speed and weight. The PCNC
1100 used by KFx weighs in at just more
than 1,000 lb – lightweight compared to the normal 5,000 lb or more for a CNC
machine.
“If you only have a thousand pounds
of iron to work with, it does not make
sense to put a lot of it in a supporting
base,” Jackson said.
Like the personal computer, as compared
to its room-sized predecessors, a
personal CNC needs to be easy to move,
easy to learn, and easy to maintain, according
to Jackson.
The PCNC 1100 uses open architecture.
The PC and Windows control
computer, G-codes and M-code commands,
drawing and image file support,
spindle taper, machine dimensions,
and the electrical interferences are all
industry standard.
One of the most challenging research
and development tasks for KFx Medical’s
new suture system was the ergonomics
of the tool’s plastic handle.
Proper Instruments
“Like all hand instruments, the
device had to have the proper feel in the
surgeon’s hands,” Ko said. “To find this
elusive feel, numerous full-size handle
prototype variations needed to be made
and put into the hands of the surgical
advisory board members.
“The design variants were comprised
of blended compound curves
and surfaces, to create an functional
and comfortable handle. The current
pallet of high-tech rapid prototyping
methods could accurately reproduce
the required shapes of the handles, but
not in materials that would stand up to
the rigors required of an orthopedic
device. Contract machine shops could
machine the handles out of suitably
robust materials, but usually required a
four to five-week lead time for delivery.”
KFx Medical’s solution was to
fabricate the handle models in-house.
According to Ko, it would be difficult
for a machinist to create the compound
shapes on a manual-milling machine.
In-house production with standard CNC
machines would be costly.
“Most entry-level machines cost
$30,000, plus the wage of a skilled CNC
programmer and machinist,” Ko said.
Such an investment was out of the
reach of a small company such as KFx.
“With the Tormach and the current
suite of 3D solid modeling and CAM
software, we are able to go from a 3D
CAD solid model to a machined handle
component in one day, and to a completed,
fully-functional handle assembly
in one week,” Ko said.
Iteration Control
“Using the personal CNC machine
did not require a highly-trained CNC
operator. The time and costs were even
less for the fabrication of the second,
third, and tertiary iterations of the same
handle design, since all of the previous
work was stored in a readily recallable
Computer Aided Machining – CAM
– program,” Ko said.
The confluence of the “individual”
CNC machine hardware at the same
time advances in design and manufacturing
software made do-it-yourself
machining a practical option for KFx; it
was “railroading” time. CAM converts
CAD files to G-code, instructions recognized
by the CNC equipment.
“The new CAM software makes it
unnecessary for the machinist to have significant experience with G-code in
order to cut a sculpted 3-D part,” Ko said.
“It actually creates the G-code.”
He uses FlashCut, Visual Mill, and
DeskProto for G-code generation. “These
CAM programs are powerful, and simple,”
he said.
KFx used the high-end SolidWorks
2006 software for its 3D MCAD, but
Ko said that the same design and prototype
project could be easily done with
the same quality in the less expensive
Alibre Design software suite.
“I use Alibre Design Professional for
my personal consulting business, which
is much, much cheaper than Solidworks,
and is fully capable solid modeler,” he
said.
Other convergences in technology
promise advancements in the small
shop and prototyping environments.
Tormach www.rsleads.com/702mn-201
What do you think?
Will the information in this article increase efficiency or save time, money, or effort? Let us know by e-mail from our website at
www.ModernApplicationsNews.com or e-mail the editor at
pnofel@nelsonpub.com.